VOA faces critical setbacks as staff placed on administrative leave

The Voice of America (VOA), a key institution in promoting freedom and democracy, went silent after 1,300 were placed on administrative leave.

Last Friday, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order calling for the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees the outlet.

This unprecedented move marks the first time in 83 years that VOA has been effectively silenced, leaving its future uncertain.

Michael Abramowitz, VOA director, expressed his deep concern about the development, highlighting the consequences it would have on the agency’s mission to inform the world, particularly in countries under authoritarian regimes. 

"I am deeply saddened that for the first time in 83 years, the storied Voice of America is being silenced," Abramowitz posted on Linked In.

"I learned this morning that virtually the entire staff of Voice of America, more than 1300 journalists, producers, and support staff, has been placed on administrative leave today. So, have I."

VOA has long been an important tool in the United States' global efforts to promote democracy and provide objective news, especially in regions where freedom of the press is restricted.

"VOA promotes freedom and democracy around the world by telling America’s story and by providing objective and balanced news and information, especially for those living under tyranny," Abramowitz stated.

He warned that even if VOA continues in some capacity, the current actions will significantly undermine its ability to promote global safety and freedom, ultimately failing to protect U.S. interests.

Since its inception, VOA has served as a lifeline for millions around the world.

Its broadcasts reach over 360 million people weekly, providing a reliable source of information in 48 languages.

Many people living under repressive regimes rely on VOA as their sole source of uncensored news.

"I salute the amazing staff of Voice of America. Many of them came to America from authoritarian countries where they were not able to practice journalism freely. It is inspiring to be their leader, and they have deep respect and appreciation for doing their part to advance freedom and democracy,” he added.

The implications for U.S. foreign policy, as well as the agency’s credibility and reach, could be devastating, leaving the world’s most oppressed populations without the journalistic resource they rely on.