Truth Commission selection panel faces criticism over transparency

The process for selecting commissioners to the Commission for Truth, Reconciliation and Healing (CTRH) is drawing sharp criticism from civil society over a lack of transparency.

The Transitional Justice Working Group (TJWG) has expressed serious concern regarding the conduct of the CTRH Selection Panel, particularly its failure to comply with Article 10(2)(f) of the CTRH Act, 2024.

“Transparency is not optional—it is a legal requirement under the CTRH Act. Excluding the media and public from interviews violates both the law and the spirit of transitional justice,” said Lony Ruot, Chair of the Transitional Justice Working Group.

The law requires that interviews be conducted with full participation of panel members and allow media and public observation. However, the Selection Panel has reportedly excluded the media and the public from attending interviews, raising serious questions about the integrity and legitimacy of the CTRH.

“A truth commission that begins behind closed doors risks losing public trust before it even starts its work,” Ruot added.

The CTRH is a key institution established under Chapter V of the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan, and its success depends on transparency, public participation, and civil society engagement.

“Victims and survivors must see and trust the process. Without openness and public participation, the credibility of the CTRH is fundamentally undermined,” Ruot emphasized.

The TJWG also pointed out that the exclusion of the media and civil society contradicts both national and international commitments.

“The exclusion of media and civil society contradicts national law, regional frameworks, and international standards that South Sudan has committed to uphold,” Ruot said.

In February 2025, the Ministry wrote to stakeholders to nominate members to the CTRH Selection Panel, which is responsible for recruiting commissioners. The panel officially began the recruitment process for the four South Sudanese commissioners in November 2025.

For the international commissioners, the African Union opened an official application process in early November 2025, with applications closing by December 1, 2025. In total, the CTRH will have seven commissioners: four South Sudanese and three international members.

The Working Group has called on the Government of South Sudan, the CTRH Selection Panel, IGAD, the African Union, UNMISS, and diplomatic partners to ensure immediate compliance with the law, to reopen or re-conduct interviews with full media and public participation, and to provide public clarification on steps taken to align the selection process with national law and peace agreement commitments.

“Early corrective action, reopening interviews and allowing public observation, is essential to protect the legitimacy of the CTRH and uphold the rule of law,” Ruot stated.

Civil society organizations, the South Sudan Bar Association, the media, and regional and international partners have been urged to closely monitor the process and support a transparent, inclusive, and victim-centered establishment of the CTRH.

“A credible Commission for Truth, Reconciliation and Healing can only be built through openness, inclusion, and respect for the rule of law,” Ruot concluded, underscoring the importance of transparency for the peace and transitional justice processes in South Sudan.

The selection panel was not immediately reachable for comment on the concerns raised by the civil society group.